- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orethu Family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Another non-notable family history article, per WP:NOR. Avinesh Jose T 06:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. --Avinesh Jose T 06:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Doczilla (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Wiki should list all topics that are available unless it is vulgar or copied. This article could be a good material for research students. Nagaraj007 (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read WP:USEFUL. Corvus cornixtalk 23:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- — Nagaraj007 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep Don't demolish the house while it's still being built : Maxwelljones (talk) 10:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- — Maxwelljones (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete per nom. Non-notable and OR. Kafka Liz (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No references provided, none available. Relata refero (talk) 16:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without sources to confirm the content, it appears to be original research. Polly (Parrot) 19:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.