Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BinDawood Holding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

BinDawood Holding

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

BinDawood Holding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The holding company is not separately notable to the BinDawood Stores topic for the shops themselves. 1292simon (talk) 08:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Your right. Run of the mill business news, routine announcements, monies raised, equities offerings. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creep^Talk 11:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Totally agree about this company and the sources being run of the mill. Therefore, it totally fails both Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.