Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SUD Life Insurance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Legoktm (talk) 16:28, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SUD Life Insurance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet the notability requirements; WP:NCORP. The very first source came from Lulu, well-known for vanity publishing
, also known as self-publishing
. A particular source from the ICRA makes this point quite obvious, "ICRA however has not conducted any audit of the rated issuer or of the information provided by it. While reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information herein is true, such information is provided 'as is' without any warranty of any kind, and ICRA in particular, makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any such information." (Citation 8, Page 8). The rated issuer
in the source is SUD Life Insurance
.
The remainder of all other sources are either simple remarks or news about selling & buying, the premium rate jumps, etc. RPSkokie (talk) 14:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. RPSkokie (talk) 14:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Maharashtra. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:09, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: This is a quasi government company and has obtained significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. Keeping aside the source from Lulu, the company meets WP:GNG and WP:NCORP from the sources and analyst reports such as [1], [2], [3]. Thesixserra (talk) 07:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: In order to establish the notability and significance of the sources provided by Thesixserra, adding a sources analysis table below; RPSkokie (talk) 08:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
| Sources | Links | Significant? | Independent? | Reliable? | Secondary? | Written by Staff Writer | Pass/Fail | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ebook: Insurance Made Easy | Link |  |
|
 |
|
Not Applicable | FAIL | No ISBN, Self-published ebook by SV Tuition, Hosted on Google Books through its Partner Center. |
| Advertorial:How Star Union Dai-ichi Life Insurance (SUD Life) enhanced employee experience with Darwinbox | Link | |
|
|
|
 |
FAIL | Not a reputable source. Probably an advertorial for Darwinbox company |
| Investment policy document: BSE India - placement memorandum about SUD Life Insurance | Link | |
|
|
|
|
FAIL | a placement memorandumis a document issued by a company which is further given to potential investors that introduces an investment and discloses information about it. |
Delete sources analysis table says everything. Yandeńo (talk) 13:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)- Delete Due to source analysis above. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I'm unable to find any references that meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 16:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.